Frequently asked questions.

Website projects start at $5,000. Most full rebuilds land between $15,000 and $60,000 depending on scope. You get a fixed-price proposal after the first call, so there are no surprises mid-project.

Most rebuilds ship in four weeks from kickoff. Larger sites with deeper content or custom CMS work can run six to eight. Either way, you get a week-by-week plan up front.

Yes, and there is no follow-up sequence afterwards. If we are not the right fit, we will tell you and point you somewhere better.

Book a 30-minute call. We will ask about your product, goals, and timeline, then send a written proposal with scope, price, and a week-by-week plan within three business days.

We send a short prep note, then spend 30 minutes on your product, goals, and timeline. Within three business days you get a written proposal with scope, price, and a week-by-week plan.

Same day on business days. US East clients usually hear back before lunch.

Nothing formal. A link to your current site and a rough sense of what is not working is plenty. We will lead the rest.

Against the goal we set at kickoff, usually qualified inbound, demo requests, or conversion rate. Clients typically see a 20 to 40 percent lift in qualified inbound inside the first quarter.

Our workday overlaps mornings in the US and full days in the UK and EU. We default to async, so nothing waits on a meeting.

Happily. Send yours over before the call, or use ours. Either way, your details stay confidential.

Our workday overlaps your morning. US clients get same-day replies before lunch, and UK and EU clients get full overlap. We default to async, with a live review every Friday.

A two-week stabilisation window is included on every project. We fix anything broken, train your team on the CMS, and hand over a written editing guide so the next update does not need us. After that, ongoing support is available as a retainer or hourly.

Mostly full website rebuilds and brand refreshes for B2B companies between Series A and enterprise. We also take on landing pages, design systems, and CMS migrations when the scope is right.

Windmark is a strategy and creative agency for B2B companies. We handle positioning, brand, design, and development for websites, end to end. Most engagements ship in four weeks, with our team of strategists, designers, and developers working as one unit on one timeline.

Book a call and we will walk you through past projects in detail: the goals we set, the decisions we made, and what changed after launch. It is the fastest way to see whether we are the right fit for yours.

Either. If your brand is strong, we build on it. If it is holding you back, we will say so and propose a refresh as part of the project.

Webflow is our default for B2B websites because the CMS is approachable and the editor experience is the best in market. We also ship Framer sites for teams that prefer it, and we have built custom Next.js sites for enterprise clients with strict security requirements.

Yes. Strategy, design, and the full build all happen in-house, so nothing gets lost in a handoff between teams.

SaaS, fintech, defence, clean-tech, developer tooling, and more. The throughline is a strong product and a website that no longer reflects it.

Yes. Full migrations from WordPress, Squarespace, Framer, and custom stacks are part of what we do. We preserve URLs, set up 301 redirects, and run an SEO audit so rankings hold steady through the cutover.

Windmark is a strategy and creative agency for B2B companies. We bring positioning, brand, design, and development under one roof, so your website ships as one coherent thing instead of a handoff between four vendors.

We work as one team on one timeline, and we treat your website as a sales surface rather than a brochure. Most agencies either strategise or build. We do both, and we ship in four weeks.

We are based in India and work with clients across the US, UK, and EU. Our day overlaps your morning, so feedback and updates move daily instead of waiting a week.

The same small team from kickoff to launch: a lead strategist, a senior designer, and a developer. No account managers in the middle, no rotating cast.

Clear positioning first, then design that earns trust, then a build that loads fast and converts. A pretty site that does not sell is a failure, and we treat it that way.

The same small team from kickoff to launch: a lead strategist, a senior designer, and a developer. No account managers in the middle, no rotating cast.

Every project runs through the same four-phase process with a Friday review built in. Nothing ships until it passes a launch checklist we sign off on together.

Most roles are hybrid-friendly with flexible hours, so you can do your best work from wherever you focus best.

Typically two to three weeks from first conversation to decision. We move fast and keep you posted at every step.

Not always. Strong craft, ownership, and clear communication matter more to us than where you have worked before.

A focused portfolio, a few pieces of role-relevant work, and a short note on what you actually contributed.

Indian Webflow agencies now deliver equivalent quality at 50–70% lower cost than their Western counterparts. The strategic capability gap that once existed has largely closed. The leading Indian agencies run brand strategy sessions, buyer journey mapping, and conversion audits alongside technical delivery. For B2B companies optimising their website ROI, the math is compelling: a Rs. 20L Indian agency engagement delivering the same output as a $60,000 US agency engagement is a meaningful budget difference.

Start with Webflow Partner status: Certified, Premium, or Enterprise. Then ask for case studies with specific performance outcomes: traffic growth, conversion rate changes, Core Web Vitals scores at launch. Check Clutch for verified third-party reviews. Then ask one test question: how would you structure the CMS for a site with a blog, case studies, and a resource library? A strong agency gives you a specific, structured answer. A weak one gives you a vague one.

A focused B2B marketing site (5 to 12 pages, standard CMS) runs Rs. 5L to Rs. 12L at quality Indian agencies. A mid-market engagement with custom design, complex CMS, HubSpot or Salesforce integration, and full strategy runs Rs. 12L to Rs. 30L. Enterprise builds with multi-language support, custom integrations, or Webflow Enterprise plan requirements run Rs. 30L+. Avoid agencies quoting under Rs. 3L for anything beyond a template customisation. At that price, corners are being cut.

Quality takes time regardless of geography. A well-scoped B2B marketing site runs 8 to 12 weeks from kickoff to launch: 1 to 2 weeks discovery, 2 to 3 weeks design, 3 to 4 weeks development, 1 to 2 weeks QA and launch. Indian agencies operating in B2B markets often run async-friendly processes for international clients, with structured check-ins and shared project management tools rather than real-time calls across every time zone.

The best ones integrate technical SEO into the build by default: proper heading hierarchy, semantic HTML, image compression, structured data, and crawl configuration. Some also offer ongoing content SEO support. If an agency treats SEO as a separate add-on, probe further. Technical SEO should be a standard part of how any Webflow site is built in 2026, not an upgrade tier.

For B2B SaaS companies, a Webflow redesign typically costs between $15,000 and $80,000 depending on scope, page count, CMS depth, and team. Most mid-market companies land at $25,000 to $45,000 for a full redesign with a specialist Webflow agency. Solo freelancers can build simpler sites for $5,000 to $12,000, but scope tends to grow during the project.

A typical B2B SaaS redesign takes 6 to 10 weeks with a mid-tier agency and 8 to 16 weeks with a senior specialist team. Freelancer projects can sometimes ship in 4 to 6 weeks but usually with reduced scope. The biggest delay factor is almost always content readiness on the client side, not design or development time.

It depends on the current site. If your existing platform is healthy with a clean CMS, decent code, and working integrations, a front-end redesign on the same stack is cheaper. If you're moving from WordPress to Webflow, or from a custom CMS to a modern platform, you're rebuilding regardless of how it's labeled. In our audits, 60% of "redesign" projects turn out to be rebuilds once we look under the hood.

Quotes vary because agencies define scope differently. A $12K quote often excludes copywriting, SEO migration, integrations, and post-launch support. A $40K quote usually includes all of it. Always ask agencies for a line-item breakdown of what's in and out of scope, and compare on deliverables, not headline numbers.

Redesign when the brand has shifted, the product has materially changed, or the site can't support new content or campaigns without engineering help. Iterate when the structure is solid but specific pages need conversion or design updates. A useful threshold: if you're changing more than 40% of pages or the underlying CMS, it's a redesign, not an iteration.

Start with Webflow Partner status, Certified or Premium. Then ask for case studies with performance data, not just visual portfolios. Ask specifically how they structure the CMS, what their post-launch handoff process looks like, and what a typical Lighthouse score looks like at launch. Agencies that can answer all four questions clearly are the ones worth shortlisting.

A focused B2B marketing site (5 to 15 pages, standard CMS) typically runs $8,000 to $25,000. A mid-market engagement with complex CMS, integrations, and a full design system runs $25,000 to $60,000. Enterprise builds with multi-language, custom membership, or advanced automation can reach $80,000+. Monthly retainers for ongoing support typically run $2,000 to $7,500 per month.

The industry standard for a full B2B marketing site is 8 to 14 weeks from kickoff to launch: 1 to 2 weeks discovery, 2 to 4 weeks design, 3 to 4 weeks development, 1 to 2 weeks QA and launch. Agencies promising a complete site in three weeks or less are either using templates or skipping the strategy phase. Both are worth probing.

For projects under $10,000 with a well-defined scope, a senior Webflow freelancer can deliver strong results. For anything above that, or any project where strategy, CMS architecture, design, development, and QA need to happen in parallel, an agency's team structure is a meaningful advantage. Continuity matters too; freelancer availability risk is real.

The best ones bake technical SEO into the build from day one: proper heading hierarchy, semantic HTML, structured data, optimised image delivery, crawl configuration, and mobile performance. SEO shouldn't be a separate engagement. If an agency treats it as an optional add-on, that's a signal they're not thinking about performance holistically.

Not if you run the migration correctly. The switch itself doesn't affect rankings, what affects rankings is losing URL equity (through missing redirects), losing metadata (through an incomplete migration), or losing crawl signals (through misconfigured robots.txt or sitemap). All three are preventable.

Usually 2–6 weeks for the bulk of your pages, depending on your crawl budget and how frequently Google was already visiting your site. High-traffic sites with good crawl budgets tend to re-index faster. Submit your sitemap and use URL Inspection on your most important pages to accelerate it.

No, Yoast is a WordPress plugin and doesn't work with Webflow. Webflow has its own SEO settings built into the CMS. For most sites, Webflow's native SEO capabilities are sufficient. If you need advanced schema control or dynamic SEO rules, you can add custom code via Webflow's embed blocks.

Your blog content needs to be moved manually or via CSV import into a Webflow CMS collection. The content itself (copy, images, headings) migrates; the WordPress metadata (Yoast title tags, meta descriptions) does not carry over automatically, you export it separately and import it via CSV.

You don't need a developer for the SEO steps, the redirect setup, sitemap, and metadata are handled through Webflow's project settings and CMS interface. You do need someone who understands SEO fundamentals. Where developers help is in cases with complex URL structures, large CMS collections, or custom schema markup requirements.

For a single high-impact landing page or a small marketing site under 10 pages, Framer is usually faster to ship and more polished out of the box. Once you cross into multi-collection CMS territory, Webflow pulls ahead.

There's no one-click migration. A typical Framer → Webflow rebuild for a 15-page site with a small CMS takes 4–6 weeks. Most of that time is rebuilding the design system in Webflow's class model and porting structured content into proper CMS collections.

For a 20-page site with one CMS collection, Webflow runs roughly $300/year (CMS plan) plus $39/month for the editor seat. Framer is around $240/year per editor on the Pro plan. The platform fee is rarely the deciding factor, total cost of ownership over 24 months is.

Both render server-side HTML and pass Core Web Vitals. Webflow has deeper structured-data tooling, automatic XML sitemap segments, and a more mature redirect editor. Framer is solid out of the box but you'll hit ceilings on advanced SEO needs around month nine.

Both are no-code, but Framer has a flatter learning curve for designers. Webflow rewards investment, once your team learns the class system, output speed jumps. If you have zero dev support AND your team is design-led, Framer is the safer bet for the first 12 months.

When you have more than three content collections, when you need server-side integrations with HubSpot/Salesforce, when localization matters, or when you plan to scale programmatic SEO pages. In those cases Framer becomes a migration project waiting to happen.