Short on time? Let AI summarize it
- A professional B2B website in 2026 typically costs $4,000 to $15,000+, depending on page count, CMS complexity, and integrations.
- Freelancers run $1,500 to $6,000. Specialist studios run $4,000 to $15,000. US and UK boutique agencies charge $30,000 to $50,000 for the same scope.
- Ongoing costs are the part people forget: hosting and platform fees ($300 to $1,000/year) plus an optional care retainer at $1,500 to $4,000/month.
- Price is driven by four things: number of unique page templates, CMS structure, integrations, and how much strategy and content work is included.
- A quote far below the range is the most expensive kind of quote. It usually means a rebuild within 12 months.
Every website conversation eventually hits the same wall. You ask three vendors what a new site costs, and you get $2,000, $12,000, and $45,000 for what sounds like the same project. None of them will explain the gap, and one of them is quietly planning to hand you a template with your logo on it.
The confusion is real, but it isn't random. Website pricing looks chaotic because "a website" describes a five-page brochure and a fifty-page CMS-driven platform equally well, and because most agencies won't publish numbers. So here are ours, along with what actually moves the price up and down. Every figure below reflects what B2B and SaaS teams genuinely pay in 2026, not a sales-page fantasy.
The Short Answer: What a Website Costs in 2026
Here is the honest range, sorted by who builds it.
| Who builds it | Typical cost | What you get | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIY builder (Wix, Squarespace) | $200 to $500/year | Template, your own labour | Pre-revenue, testing an idea |
| Freelancer | $1,500 to $6,000 | One person, limited QA | Small sites, tight budgets |
| Specialist studio (offshore) | $4,000 to $15,000 | Strategy, design, build, QA | Funded B2B and SaaS teams |
| US or UK boutique agency | $30,000 to $50,000 | Same scope, local rates | Teams with budget to spend locally |
| Enterprise agency | $75,000 to $250,000+ | Large teams, procurement, custom builds | Enterprise, complex platforms |
The middle two rows are where most funded B2B companies land, and the gap between them is the single biggest pricing decision you will make. A $12,000 build from a specialist studio and a $40,000 build from a US boutique often produce comparable work, because the difference is overhead and location, not craft. That gap matters most right after a raise, when the money is earmarked for engineers and salespeople rather than a rebrand.
Weighing the first two rows specifically? We break that decision down in detail in Webflow agency vs freelancer: a cost comparison.
Cost by Website Size
Page count is the crudest pricing lever, but it is the one buyers ask about, so here is the breakdown. What matters is not raw page count but the number of unique templates, because the tenth page built from an existing template costs a fraction of the first.
Landing page (1 page): $800 to $2,500. A single conversion-focused page with copy, design, and build. Fast to produce, usually one to two weeks.
Small site (5 pages): $3,000 to $6,000. Home, about, services, contact, and one more. This is the classic small-business site. If someone quotes $500 for this, they are using a template and skipping strategy entirely.
Standard B2B site (10 to 15 pages): $6,000 to $12,000. Adds service pages, a blog with CMS structure, case studies, and usually a pricing page. This is the typical funded-startup build.
Larger site (20+ pages): $12,000 to $25,000. Multiple templates, deeper CMS collections, integrations, and often a component library so your marketing team can build new pages without a developer.
Custom platform or e-commerce: $25,000+. Custom functionality, complex data, or a storefront moves you into genuinely custom development, and estimates should be scoped individually.
One caution on per-page pricing: if a vendor prices strictly by page count, they are pricing production, not outcomes. A twelve-page site that converts is worth more than a thirty-page site nobody reads, and the good studios price the project, not the page.
Why Web Development Is So Expensive
The sticker shock usually comes from assuming you are paying for someone to arrange boxes on a screen. You are not. On a typical $10,000 B2B build, the actual work splits roughly like this.
Strategy and content structure (15 to 20%). Positioning, messaging, sitemap, and what each page has to prove. Skip this and you get a pretty site that says nothing, which is the most common way budgets get wasted.
Design (30 to 35%). Not just visuals: the design system, responsive behaviour across breakpoints, states, and components that will still work when your team adds pages in six months.
Development (30 to 35%). Building it properly, structuring the CMS so content is manageable, wiring integrations, and ensuring the thing loads fast. Core Web Vitals affect both rankings and conversion, per Google Search Central, so performance work is not optional polish.
QA, launch, and handoff (10 to 15%). Cross-browser testing, responsive checks, broken links, analytics and tracking setup, redirects, and training your team to actually use it.
The cheap quotes get cheap by deleting the first and last categories. That is why a $1,500 site so often needs replacing within a year: nobody defined what it should say, and nobody checked whether it worked.
The Ongoing Costs Nobody Quotes You
The build is a one-time number. Running the site is not, and this is where budgets get ambushed.
Platform and hosting: $300 to $1,000 per year for a typical B2B site. Webflow site plans run roughly $14 to $39 per month billed annually, with additional Workspace seats and add-ons like Localization or Analyze charged separately.
Domain and email: $50 to $200 per year.
Maintenance and care retainer: $1,500 to $4,000 per month if you want ongoing support. A good retainer covers content updates, speed and SEO maintenance, security and platform updates, and a steady stream of landing pages and conversion experiments. This is optional, but teams that treat the website as a growth channel rather than a finished asset almost always end up here.
Ad hoc changes: if you skip the retainer, budget $100 to $200 per hour for one-off work, and expect slower turnaround because you are not in anyone's schedule.
The honest framing: a website is not a purchase, it is a system you either maintain or watch decay. Teams that budget only for the build usually find themselves paying for a redesign two years later, which costs more than the maintenance would have. If a rebuild is already on your roadmap, we price that separately in our guide to website redesign cost.
What Actually Drives Your Price Up or Down
Two projects with the same page count can differ by a factor of three. Here is what causes that.
Pushes cost up: custom functionality or calculators; complex CMS structures with interlinked collections; integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, or a product API; multilingual or localized versions; heavy custom animation; content and copywriting written from scratch; migrating a large existing site with redirect mapping; and compliance requirements like accessibility audits or SOC 2 adjacent security review.
Pulls cost down: clear brand guidelines and a finished Figma file; content that already exists and is signed off; a smaller number of unique templates; fast, consolidated feedback from one decision-maker; and a platform your team already uses.
The most expensive variable is not on either list, though, because it is you. Slow client feedback is the leading cause of blown timelines and inflated costs on web projects. Every week a decision sits unmade is a week of an agency's schedule held open. If you want to spend less, do not haggle the rate. Lock your content, name one decision-maker, and turn feedback around in 48 hours.
Where Offshore Fits, and When It Does Not
The reason a $12,000 build and a $40,000 build can produce similar work is overhead. A US or UK boutique carries local salaries, office costs, and account management layers that a lean distributed studio does not. That difference lands in your quote, not in your finished site.
Rates broadly look like this in 2026: US and UK agencies charge $100 to $250 per hour; Eastern European studios $50 to $100; Indian specialist studios $25 to $60. For a fixed-scope B2B website, that is roughly a 40 to 70% saving for comparable output, which is why the global IT outsourcing market is projected to cross half a trillion dollars in 2026 (Statista).
The caveat is that the quality range offshore is genuinely wide, so who you pick matters far more than the decision to go offshore. What separates a good outcome from a bad one is specialization (a Webflow-for-SaaS studio beats a generalist every time), real timezone overlap for live collaboration rather than pure async handoff, and clear IP assignment in writing. When those three are in place, offshore is leverage. When they are not, the savings evaporate into rework. We go deeper on vetting in our guide to outsourcing web development.
How to Set a Realistic Website Budget
Work backwards from what the site has to do, not from what you hope to spend.
If you are pre-revenue or testing: $0 to $2,000. Use a builder or a template. Do not spend real money on a site for a product you are still validating.
If you are a funded startup with a sales motion: $6,000 to $15,000. Your website is now doing work your founders used to do in person, and Gartner reports B2B buyers complete roughly two-thirds of their journey before speaking to anyone. This is the band where the site starts paying for itself.
If you are scaling with a marketing team: $12,000 to $25,000 plus a retainer. You need a system your team can extend, not a set of static pages.
If you are enterprise: $50,000+. Procurement, security review, and complex integrations change the shape of the project entirely.
Then apply one sanity check. If a website generates even two additional qualified deals a year and your average contract is $20,000, a $12,000 site pays for itself several times over. The number that matters is not the invoice, it is the invoice measured against pipeline. That is also the argument to bring to your CFO, because "we need a nicer site" loses budget conversations and "this is our highest-traffic sales asset" wins them.
The Windmark Approach: What We Charge and Why
We build B2B and SaaS websites in Webflow, and our pricing is deliberately public because vague pricing wastes everyone's time. Projects start around $4,000 for a focused site and run to $15,000+ for larger redesigns with custom CMS and integrations, delivered in a 4 to 8 week sprint. Care-plan retainers run $1,500 to $4,000 per month for teams who want the site maintained and improved rather than frozen.
What that includes, and what makes the number what it is: strategy and messaging before design, a proper design system rather than one-off pages, Webflow development your marketing team can update without a developer, Core Web Vitals performance work, and QA plus handoff training. What it does not include is a US agency's overhead, which is the entire reason the same scope costs $30,000 to $50,000 in New York or London.
Our rule of thumb for buyers, whoever you hire: get every quote broken into strategy, design, development, and QA. If a vendor cannot show you that split, they either have not scoped it or they are hiding what they are skipping. The breakdown tells you more about the quality of the work than the total ever will.
Related: See our work · Webflow development · How to Outsource Web Development · Webflow agency vs freelancer: cost comparison
If you are scoping a website and want a straight answer on what your specific project should cost, we will give you one. Book a 20-minute scoping call and we will break your requirements into strategy, design, development, and QA, and tell you the realistic range, including if that range means you should not hire us.
Frequently asked questions
A freelancer typically charges $1,500 to $6,000, a specialist studio $4,000 to $15,000, and a US or UK boutique agency $30,000 to $50,000 for comparable scope. The variation comes from overhead and what is included: cheaper quotes usually exclude strategy, QA, and CMS structure rather than doing the same work for less.
A professional five-page website typically costs $3,000 to $6,000, covering strategy, custom design, development, and QA. Template-based versions can be produced for a few hundred dollars, but they skip the positioning and structure work that makes a site convert, and usually need replacing within a year.
For a funded B2B or SaaS company, $6,000 to $15,000 is a realistic budget for a website that generates pipeline. Pre-revenue teams should spend under $2,000 and use a builder. Scaling companies with a marketing team should budget $12,000 to $25,000 plus an ongoing retainer.
Agencies charge either by project or by hour. Hourly rates run $100 to $250 in the US and UK, $50 to $100 in Eastern Europe, and $25 to $60 at Indian specialist studios. Most B2B website projects are quoted as a fixed scope rather than hourly, which protects you from overruns.
Because most of the cost is not visual design. On a typical build, roughly 15 to 20% goes to strategy and content structure, 30 to 35% to design systems and responsive behaviour, 30 to 35% to development and performance, and 10 to 15% to QA, launch, and handoff. Cheap quotes get cheap by deleting the strategy and QA stages.
Outsourcing a B2B website to a specialist offshore studio typically costs $4,000 to $15,000, roughly 40 to 70% less than a comparable US or UK agency build. The saving comes from overhead rather than quality, but the quality range offshore is wide, so vet for specialization, timezone overlap, and written IP assignment.
Ongoing website support usually takes one of two forms: a care retainer at $1,500 to $4,000 per month covering updates, performance, and improvements, or ad hoc work billed at $100 to $200 per hour. Platform and hosting costs are separate and typically run $300 to $1,000 per year.
Yes, upfront. A builder costs $200 to $500 per year versus thousands for a custom build. The tradeoff is that you supply the strategy, design, copy, and labour yourself, and template sites are harder to differentiate and optimize. Builders make sense pre-revenue; they cost you conversions once a real sales motion depends on the site.
Your product deserves a better website.
Start with a free 45-minute CRO and CMS review of your current site.













